The U.S. Supreme Court heard, on December 3, 2007, a job-related age discrimination case in which the Justices questioned the relevance of “me too” evidence. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/washington/04scotus.html?_r=3&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1197252263-sjRNGwGwkDPcErysWFi9WA&oref=slogin. The Justices’ apparent objections to plaintiff’s argument of relevancy are depicted below in an ADEPT™ Inference Path argument map. Depending on the strength attached to the objections, the Justices may not reach plaintiff’s conclusion.